(Pic - "The Sermon on the Mount" from Ecce Homo. Elizabeth Ohlson Wallin, 1998, Photograph, 79" x 60")
My journey
with Christianity has, it needs to be said, been a fairly robust one – on both
sides, I suppose. I was born and raised in a fairly ordinary Christian
home. By this, I mean, that we went to a
little parish Church within walking distance of our house. We cooked a turkey at Christmas and had
Christmas pudding aflame with brandy. We
had Easter Eggs at Easter and otherwise lived fairly ordinary, middle-of-the-road
lives. My parents were standard parents,
with fairly standard ideas. It was a
happy home and the Church was a reasonable part of it. We got baptised as infants and confirmed on
reaching puberty. If we got married, it
was in the parish church. If you died, that is where you got buried from. It was just the way you did things.
My siblings
were much older than me and had gone their separate ways by the time my
hormones started raging. And when they
did, they raged within the fairly safe confines of Church youth groups and choir
practise – so generally, it was all relatively safe and sound.
I knew from
an early age that I wanted to become a Priest.
I used to explain to my easily bewildered students, many years down the
track, that it was primarily the gorgeous clothes the priest wore that had
initially attracted me to the priesthood.
Of course, my motives all got dressed up in stuff the bishops wanted to
hear, like calling and vocation and things like that – but actually, it was the
glamour – the sheer outright drama of the thing, which did it.
I went to
study theology at Rhodes University and Cambridge and Manchester. I loved it all! I loved the academic rigour,
the debate, the sheer, glorious liberation of being able to think things
through and to discard the nonsense and hold on to what made rational sense. I had some pretty amazing teachers – I think
of the extraordinary Canon John Suggit.
I think of Bishop John Robinson, who was quite happy to throw the baby
out with the bathwater and still was able to maintain some kind of link with both
the religion and the institution of the Church (and more amazingly, was allowed
to do so!)
I worked for
a while as a priest in Lesotho. In
reality, it was a convenient cover for political activity. But it was also character-moulding in all
sorts of ways. If I close my eyes, I can
still remember the day I was made Deacon in the Cathedral of St Mary and St
James, Maseru. There is a point in the
service, where the Deacon is required to prostrate himself before the altar. I remember the freezing cold of the stone
floor, the smell of the incense mixed with wood smoke. I remember the overwhelming drama of the
thing and the sense of dignity and communion as the massive congregation
welcomed me.
I was
ordained Priest in Manchester Cathedral, after long negotiations with the ecclesiastical
authorities, because of my refusal to swear any oath of allegiance to the
Queen. I remember the growl of the organ
and the triumphant procession. I remember
the taste of the wine at the first Mass where I was the celebrant.
So when I
call myself an ex-Christian, it is not an easy thing. I have so much of the religion etched in my
brain, in my consciousness and my unconsciousness. The images, the sights the sounds, the smells
– these are a significant part of me. And I entered into it, for a massive
chunk of my life, fully and passionately.
Doubtless, I would still be there, if it were in any way possible.
When a new Archbishop
of Canterbury is enthroned – something happens inside me. It is difficult to explain – but I am still
connected to it long enough to remember that I have since rejected it all. When a Pope resigns and a new one is chosen,
something in my inner being awakens and reacts.
When we approach Eastertide and my child asks me about the plagues in
Egypt, I react with something much more than passing interest.
And it is not
that I believe in any kind of objective God, really, it is not. And it is not that I regret not believing in
God. It is something quite aside from
that. It is a strange and eerie connection
with the rich past which has made me who I am.
It is impossible to pretend that it means nothing, or that it achieved
nothing or that it is worth nothing. And
I would not want to do that.
In the end,
we, as a same-sex family with two adopted children, decided to cut ties with
the Church once and for all, for reasons which have nothing to do with
belief. It was simply impossible to
continue in it as second-class citizens and for our children to be brought up
in an environment where we were not fully and completely accepted. It became abundantly
clear that it would be asking too much of an institution, riven with its own
lies and contradictions, on the question of sexuality – (let alone theology!).
And so, I
live my life without the Church any more.
There are some things I miss intensely and many more things I don’t. I miss the drama and the ritual and the rumble
of the organ. I miss the hieratic
language and the powerful, living poetry which accompanies it. I don’t miss the bigotry and the
anti-intellectual conservatism and the lies and the all-pervading, inescapable hypocrisy,
which is allowed to grow and flourish and flower and seed, without any hinder
or check.
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt, that for all of it, my children – in their
particular circumstance are better - much better - without it. I am not sure I will be able to protect them
from its worst excesses forever, but I am going to do my best to shield them,
for as long as possible. So they will
have to be content with Easter eggs rather than the extraordinary story of hope
rising from the darkness of the tomb.
I enjoyed reading your post. It makes me very sad that the church has alienated so many people. You write about two teachers named John, there is another one. I have found the writings of Bishop John Selby Spong very helpful. He regards liturgy as poetry and says atheism is not the only alternative to theism. Becuause of him and other authors like Robert Funk I can be a post-modern believer of some sort while being intellectually honest. I want our son (10y) to know the stories of the library called the bible, without the baggage of having to take it literally. There is a richness in the stories and symbols. He will make up is own mind what he believes (or not) one day.
ReplyDeleteI coincidently came across this, and reading it really makes me sad.
ReplyDeleteI was raised a Christian and have spoken to people of many religions, especially atheists.
I am disgusted with the way the Church can treat certain people.
The church I go to sent a young pastor away because he wasn't married. And now everyone seems so cold and unfriendly.
Most of the atheists that spoke to me were more concerned with how Christians judged them and how the Church killed people in the past, than they were concerned with science.
And about science... there are often conflicts between science and the Bible, though one cannot simply ignore concrete evidence. I remember a boy in my class once said fossils were probably planted by someone purposely and evolution doesn't exist.
I go with theistic evolution, though. God and science together.
Anyways, I just wonder what happened to the No.1 rule of the Bible that says we should love everyone. And yet I suppose people never quite obeyed it. My mother, for instance, was raised in some sort of Christian religion where the pastor told them that every other religion, even Catholics and other types of Christians, were going to go to hell. It's just absurd.
So yeah.
I just want to say that you seem like a good person and I'm sorry that people, even the Church, could drive you away.
And good luck with whatever may come your way.
You described very well the feeling I have today for Catholicism, even I do not have an involvement as big as yours, I also grew up in a home like that, but I felt that there was no room for me there. Great text, a hug!
ReplyDeleteE. - Brazil