Showing posts with label Sally Gross. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sally Gross. Show all posts
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Sally Gross - Many parts to a whole
There cannot be many people - (no I am teasing, there is only one) - who would have started life as a Jewish boy called Selwyn; converted to Christianity; became a Dominican Monk; became a communist; entered the anti-apartheid struggle, joined the African National Congress and helped organise the Dakar talks between the ANC and the apartheid government; and then decided to investigate what she called her "bodiliness" only to discover that she had been incorrectly described, at birth as male. She called herself Sally and she wore a dress.
When she approached her Order about the anomaly of a fully ordained Roman Catholic Priest, who was actually a woman, the church did what it normally does in instances where it is caught between a cross and and a garotte - and simply excommunicated her. There she was, left on the streets - a world authority on the works of St Thomas Aquinas, but homeless and jobless because of her preferred gender.
After reading some of the emails Sally sent out about about her plight, I put the matter to my boss - a deeply humane and excruciatingly efficient person - and a contract was arranged for Sally to work in the Regional Land Claims Commission of the Western Cape as a researcher. She worked there, reasonably happily, for many years.
In the beginning it was strange, many people tell me - to have this large person with a deep booming, rather plummy voice, in a dress, insisting that she was MISS Sally Gross. Claimants who encountered her on the telephone, would sometimes insist, when they met her, that they had spoken to a man, not a woman. She would quickly put them right. Fellow officials, even today, many years after she had left the Commission, will recount instances of Sally emerging furious from her office, in full flight and throat, flailing her cane about and not shy to connect with anyone in her rampage.
Sally was a character. I remember her in Pietermaritzburg, (when she was still Selwyn and teaching at St Joseph's Seminary). When you met her casually in the street, she would immediately engage on some issue or the other. She would quote Latin, Hebrew, Greek to you - and assume that you understood. She knew everything about everything - as far as I could work out. And not just the basics. Not just the general drift of an argument. She would know the fine detail - the argumentative twists and turns - the very substance of anything you wanted to talk about - with references. And her graciousness was never to expose you for your mere nodding acquaintance with the matter to hand. She would simply assume that your knowledge was as vast as hers - and carry on.
The Church scarred Sally. It did so knowingly and it did so repeatedly. And the people in it who did so should please bow their sorry heads in shame at this point. Hold the false grief, please. Close your avuncular mouthes. Bury the platitudes and just shut up. You can have nothing to say. Take your loving Jesus anywhere else - but not here.
Sally didn't ever pretend to be a saint. But nor would she pretend to be anything other than who she was. She refused to allow herself to be anything other than what she was - and she was made to pay dearly for doing so, by the church with the victim saviour. She refused to fit the mould. She would not. She could not.
I once said to her, not so long ago when we were discussing our mutual disgust with the church, that I had never depended upon a belief in God to appreciate the goodness of the world - she agreed with me, in a simple and uncomplicated (and unreferenced!) way. Neither had she and neither did she.
Sally had journeyed from Jew, to Christian, to Communist, to Buddhist to secularist. And although she would share and appreciate a range of beauty in all of these, it was to the beauty of nothingness, of the nihil that she would trudge towards in the end.
She had no fear of death - we discussed it on numerous occasions. She had a fear of dying alone. And that is what happened. And the fact that it happened in the way that it did is a testament to the singular, lonely path she trod. It was never easy. It was never grand or ostentatious. It was never flashy. It was what it was. And those of us who knew her should not punish ourselves too much over it. It was usually unsupported. That was her life.
I will miss her insight and her shy sense of humour. I will miss the camaraderie we shared as exiles and outcasts, both as priests and as christians and as ANC members. I will miss that plummy voice on the end of the phone, quoting Hebrew at me. Most of all, I will miss her courage. I will miss the fact that she was not only form - she was also substance. A rare thing in this country of ours. Hamba Kahle MISS Sally Gross.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Caster Semenya and the intersex row
Pic: Sally Gross from Intersex South AfricaAs I said when I commented before, Caster Semenya has unwittingly raised the debate about intersex in a way which we have never before experienced in this country. Because now we have the possible anomaly of an intersex person, who is a national hero (I use the word generically), who is black and who has been unbelievably badly treated by the media, the IAAF, and by every bigot in and out of town, the world over.
Winnie Madikizela-Mandela, as she usually manages to do, was in the right place, saying the right things. It is extraordinary to me how she manages to do this - and I say this with the utmost respect and admiration. Because few others of her ilk do the same. If there are flood victims, she is there. If some white shoots black kids on a farm somewhere, she is there. If someone like Caster Semenya is abused by the media after a stunning world championship, she is at the airport to greet her. I have always admired Madikizela-Mandela, despite her many flaws.
But South Africa as a whole, for the first time in history, has had to face the issue of intersex. The radio stations have been jammed with people expressing their opinions on the matter. You will hear it discussed in the lift. I just saw a long interview on the television with Sally Gross, who heads Intersex South Africa talking about the difficulties which intersex people have, the challenges they are faced with, the prevalence of the thing (she said that in South Africa it is as high as 1/500 – as opposed to a world average of 1/2000, which is still pretty high!)
I remember years ago, when I was a priest in rural Lesotho, having to trek for miles into the mountain to a really rural village to bury an extremely old woman. When we got to the village, we found it in trauma. The old lady had been someone everyone in the village had grown up with. Everyone knew her, and loved her. But when the body was washed before burial, it was discovered that she had male genitalia. The discovery traumatised the entire village.
And the same sort of thing is what has happened with Caster Semenya. The official report is still to be released, but bigots should take no comfort in that at all – because the findings seem to have been leaked. She is, in all likelihood, intersex. And sport, like religion, it would appear, does not have a category for anything other than the binary male/female formula. And the people are traumatised because of it.
One wonders why? If this is a condition which is as prevalent as it appears to be, then why is this all so much of a surprise? I note, in the newspapers, at the same time as this story is breaking, that there is another – saying that conservative churches in South Africa, with apparent close ties to the ruling African National Congress, are starting to lobby hard on getting rights guaranteed to Gay and Lesbian people, removed from the statute books, and presumably also, the Constitution.
I would ask them (but of course, they will not hear and nor will they answer intelligibly) just to pause for a moment or two before they rush headlong over the Gadarene cliff, to consider Caster Semenya. Who made her the way she is? Is it her parents fault perhaps? Is it God’s? Or is it just a feature of as yet uncelebrated human diversity?
The salutary point is that often, things are not quite what they might seem. And books should not be judged by covers. And the human species is hugely diverse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

